Report error Found 36 Enz. Inhib. hit(s) with all data for entry = 7681
Affinity DataIC50: 8.90nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 10nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 11nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 14nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 14nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 17nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 18nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 22nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 23nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
3D Structure (crystal)Affinity DataIC50: 30nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 37nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 41nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 54nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 73nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 87nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 91nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 100nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 159nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 170nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 180nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 190nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 190nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 220nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 270nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 320nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 340nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 360nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 410nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 450nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 980nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 1.40E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 1.40E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 8.80E+3nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 1.51E+4nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 4.30E+4nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
Affinity DataIC50: 3.80E+5nMAssay Description:IC50 values were determined following a standard method that has been described previously (Reeve et al., 2014, 2016).More data for this Ligand-Target Pair
